By Robert Asher, Lawrence B. Goodheart, Alan Rogers
A historic romp throughout the interesting topic of homicide jurisprudence within the usa from the colonial interval to the current, displaying how altering social mores have inspired the appliance of homicide law.
This attention-grabbing assortment examines homicide jurisprudence—the social principles that govern the arrest, trial, and punishment of individuals accused of murder—in the U.S. from the colonial interval to the current. The participants exhibit how altering social mores have inspired the applying of homicide legislations via highlighting the methods cultural biases like racism, altering principles approximately early life and madness, and the ameliorative results of center category prestige and paternal imagery either helped and handicapped folks accused of homicide. Such well-known circumstances because the Lizzie Borden awl homicide and African American activist Abu-Jamal’s homicide trial are included.
Robert Asher is Professor Emeritus of background on the collage of Connecticut.
Lawrence B. Goodheart is Professor of heritage on the collage of Connecticut and writer of Mad Yankees: The Hartford Retreat for the Insane and Nineteenth-Century Psychiatry.
Alan Rogers is Professor of background at Boston College.
Read Online or Download Murder On Trial: 1620-2002 PDF
Similar legal history books
This ebook is a crucial contribution to the present vigorous debate concerning the dating among legislations and society within the Roman international. This debate, which used to be initiated by means of the paintings of John criminal within the 1960's, has had a profound impression upon the examine of legislations and background and has created sharply divided critiques at the quantity to which legislation can be stated to be a fabricated from the society that created it.
Have been slaves estate or humans below the legislations? Antebellum Southern judges designed effective legislation that secure estate rights and helped slavery stay economically doable, legislation that sheltered the people embodied through that propertySH-the slaves themselves. by accident, those judges generated ideas appropriate to dull americans.
Tough notions of race and sexuality presumed to have originated and flourished within the slave South, Diane Miller Sommerville strains the evolution of white southerners' fears of black rape through studying genuine circumstances of black-on-white rape during the 19th century. Sommerville demonstrates that regardless of draconian statutes, accused black rapists often kept away from execution or castration, principally because of intervention via individuals of the white group.
Written by way of a journalist, this booklet depicts the day by day struggles and matters of inmates a the Connecticut Correctional establishment in Niantic (renamed the Janet S. York correctional Institution), the state's simply felony for girls. construct in 1917 as a piece farm for prostitutes, unwed moms, and different girls of allegedly immoral personality, "the Farm," because it remains to be known as, has lengthy served as a barometer of triumphing social attitudes towards girls.
- Religion, Law, and the Land: Native Americans and the Judicial Interpretation of Sacred Land (Contributions in Legal Studies)
- The Burger Court and the Rise of the Judicial Right
- Changes in Law and Society during the Civil War and Reconstruction: A Legal History Documentary Reader (Legal History Documentary Readers)
- Law and Society in Byzantium: Ninth-Twelfth Centuries (Dumbarton Oaks Other Titles in Byzantine Studies)
- Governing the Hearth: Law and the Family in Nineteenth-Century America (Studies in Legal History)
Additional info for Murder On Trial: 1620-2002
W. Fitzhugh Brundage, Lynching in the New South: Georgia and Virginia, 1880–1930 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1993), 71. 32. Historians have noted that beginning in the eighteenth century, English jurisprudence in capital cases stressed strict adherence to legal procedures. If a person’s life was to be taken, the law had to be followed to the letter. Without adherence to the processes stipulated by the law in capital cases, in which the punishment was the most severe possible—death—all law would come into disrepute.
In May 1920, in the middle of a period of intense fear of the activities of immigrant revolutionaries, Nicola Sacco and Bartolomeo Vanzetti, Italian immigrants who were militant anarchists and frequently carried revolvers, were charged with payroll robbery and the murder of two payroll guards in Braintree, Massachusetts. The prosecutor in this case (Frederick Katzman) decided early on that anarchists must have carried out the robbery. The eyewitnesses to the robbery initially were unsure of their identiﬁcation of the two robbers; but at trial, under pressure from Katzman, several witnesses went on to proclaim the certainty of their identiﬁcations.
Mapp v. S. 643 (1961). 15. Gideon v. S. 335 (1963). At his retrial Gideon had a lawyer, and a jury acquitted him. 16. Malloy v. S. 1, 7 (1964). 17. Miranda v. S. 436 (1066). 18. ” Texas Law Review 39 (1961): 545; Witherspoon v. S. 510 (1968); Taylor v. S. 522 (1975). 19. Lee Epstein and Joseph F. Kobylka, The Supreme Court and Legal Change (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press: 1992), 70, 75. 20. , 71–75. New York Times, January 18, 1972. 21. Furman v. S. 238 (1972). 22. Ibid. 23.