Conquest by Law: How the Discovery of America Dispossessed by Lindsay G. Robertson

By Lindsay G. Robertson

In 1823, leader Justice John Marshall passed down a excellent courtroom determination of huge significance in defining the rights of indigenous peoples during the English-speaking international. on the middle of the choice for Johnson v. M'Intosh was once a "discovery doctrine" that gave rights of possession to the ecu sovereigns who "discovered" the land and switched over the indigenous vendors into tenants. although its that means and purpose has been fiercely disputed, greater than one hundred seventy five years later, this doctrine continues to be the legislations of the land. In 1991, whereas investigating the invention doctrine's historic origins Lindsay Robertson made a startling locate; within the basement of a Pennsylvania furniture-maker, he found a trunk with the whole company files of the Illinois and Wabash Land businesses, the plaintiffs in Johnson v. M'Intosh. Conquest through legislations presents, for the 1st time, the full and troubling account of the eu "discovery" of the Americas. it is a gripping story of political collusion, detailing how a spurious declare gave upward thrust to a doctrine--intended to be of restricted application--which itself gave upward thrust to an enormous displacement of individuals and the construction of a legislation that governs indigenous humans and their lands to today.

Show description

Read or Download Conquest by Law: How the Discovery of America Dispossessed Indigenous Peoples of Their Lands PDF

Best legal history books

Beyond Dogmatics: Law and Society in the Roman World (Edinburgh Studies in Law)

This e-book is a vital contribution to the present energetic debate in regards to the courting among legislations and society within the Roman global. This debate, which used to be initiated by means of the paintings of John criminal within the 1960's, has had a profound impression upon the research of legislations and historical past and has created sharply divided critiques at the quantity to which legislations can be acknowledged to be a fabricated from the society that created it.

The Bondsman’s Burden: An Economic Analysis of the Common Law of Southern Slavery

Have been slaves estate or humans lower than the legislations? Antebellum Southern judges designed effective legislation that safe estate rights and helped slavery stay economically attainable, legislation that sheltered the individuals embodied by way of that propertySH-the slaves themselves. by chance, those judges generated ideas acceptable to dull american citizens.

Rape and Race in the Nineteenth-Century South

Not easy notions of race and sexuality presumed to have originated and flourished within the slave South, Diane Miller Sommerville strains the evolution of white southerners' fears of black rape by way of reading genuine circumstances of black-on-white rape through the 19th century. Sommerville demonstrates that regardless of draconian statutes, accused black rapists often shunned execution or castration, mostly because of intervention by way of participants of the white neighborhood.

The farm: life inside a women's prison

Written by means of a journalist, this booklet depicts the day by day struggles and issues of inmates a the Connecticut Correctional establishment in Niantic (renamed the Janet S. York correctional Institution), the state's purely legal for ladies. construct in 1917 as a piece farm for prostitutes, unwed moms, and different ladies of allegedly immoral personality, "the Farm," because it remains to be known as, has lengthy served as a barometer of winning social attitudes towards ladies.

Additional resources for Conquest by Law: How the Discovery of America Dispossessed Indigenous Peoples of Their Lands

Example text

The colony of Virginia had a claim under its royal charter to the lands Murray had purchased from the Illinois Indians. 15 Dunmore, a year younger than Dartmouth, was sitting on a powder keg. Appointed Virginia’s governor in , he quickly came into conflict with the colony’s legislative assembly, which included many soon to be prominent revolutionaries, among them Thomas Jefferson and Patrick Henry. In the spring of , a year before Murray arrived with the Illinois petition, the assembly had established the first colonywide committee of correspondence to coordinate resistance to Britain.

60 Several shareholders, including Daniel Heister, remained seated in Con-     gress. Were more shareholders to attain positions of influence, the Companies might yet persuade Congress to deal. The fatal flaw in this plan became evident in . All of the most prominent shareholders were members of the governing Federalist Party. In , in what was then termed a “revolution,” Thomas Jefferson’s Republicans swept the Federalists from both the House of Representatives and the Executive Mansion; two years later, Jefferson’s party took control of the Senate.

In the early nineteenth century such lawsuits were called “ejectment” actions. These were “local” actions that could be tried only before juries composed of residents of the area in which the disputed lands lay. The rationale for this rule was that only neighbors familiar with the property would be sufficiently knowledgeable to understand the interests at stake. Consequently, the actions had to be filed in a court with geographic jurisdiction over the lands. If the lands were located in the Northwest Territory, as the Illinois and Wabash lands were, that meant the lawsuit had to be filed in the Northwest Territorial Court.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.62 of 5 – based on 25 votes