A History of Epidemiologic Methods and Concepts by Alfredo Morabia (auth.), Alfredo Morabia (eds.)

By Alfredo Morabia (auth.), Alfredo Morabia (eds.)

Methods, simply as illnesses or scientists, have their very own background. it is vital for scientists to concentrate on the genesis of the equipment they use and of the context during which they have been developed.

A background of Epidemiologic tools and Concepts relies on a suite of contributions which seemed in "SPM overseas magazine of Public Health", beginning in January 2001. The contributions concentrate on the old emergence of present epidemiological equipment and their relative significance at diversified time cut-off dates, instead of on particular achievements of epidemiology in controlling plagues reminiscent of cholera, tuberculosis, malaria, typhoid fever, or lung melanoma. The papers current the layout of potential and retrospective reviews, and the thoughts of bias, confounding, and interplay. The compilation of articles is complemented by way of an advent and reviews through Prof. Alfredo Morabia which places them within the context of present epidemiological research.

Show description

Read Online or Download A History of Epidemiologic Methods and Concepts PDF

Similar history_1 books

U.S. Navy Floatplanes of World War II in Action

Earlier than the arrival of radar and different digital units aboard warships, the roles of searching out the enemy and recognizing naval gunfire fell to the floatplane scouts. those small 1- and 2-seat catapult-launched plane served aboard US army ships because the eyes of the fleet until eventually mid-1949. so much battleships carried as much as four floatplanes; cruisers with plane hangars may perhaps accommodate as many as eight airplane; destroyers, whilst acceptable, have been constrained to simply 1 floatplane.

Additional resources for A History of Epidemiologic Methods and Concepts

Sample text

Snow refers to this ratio by saying, inappropriately, that it is "the proportion of deaths to 10,000 houses" (Snow, 1855, p. 86). However, to interpret the ratio of deaths to households as a proportion or a risk, Snow would have had to assume that the average size of the households was similar across London. 4 times larger than in the more well off house blocks supplied by the Lambeth company. 4)] is equivalent to [98 + 26,107]. Indeed, According to John Eyler (Eyler, Part Ia), the fact that Snow did not know the number of clients at risk of cholera fed the initial skepticism towards his conclusions.

3. Incidence density and cumulative incidence OlliS. Miettinen, from the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Harvard School of Public Health, revisited the relation of risk to rate 138 years after Farr in another seminal paper in the history of epidemiologic methods and concepts entitled "Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies" (Miettinen, 1976a). 11). Miettinen renamed the incidence rate "incidence density", and interestingly, listed as synonyms two of Farr's expressions, "force of morbidity" and "force of mortality".

L1t = 5 for a 5-year risk). In this situation: Cumulative incidence(up to time i! = Ifrom time i = 1 to; IDi X l':lti Miettinen's innovative concepts have reached a much larger audience than the papers in which he developed them. The original papers can be arduous for someone who is not already familiar with epidemiologic concepts and methods and does not have some mathematical background. Therefore, his concepts have usually been disseminated through the work of people who wrote didactic translations of his ideas.

Download PDF sample

Rated 5.00 of 5 – based on 11 votes